Integrating Complexities
Creating a New Future by Design
Creating a Future:
· Is only particles of the Past; it is not the Past,
· It is a HU-Being’s Designed Actions of the Vital Now
· By thoughts of the already Hindsight Pervasive Past and
· Making Decisions of Integrated Complexities of the Pervasive Future.
BUCKY FULLER’S THOUGHTS: In order that humans might have evolving function, they were first given brains and then access to mind……. Mind deals only in the discovery of truth and the interrelationship of all the truths.
OMNISCIENT: OMNI KNOWING
While nature undoubtedly initiated the installation of humans on planet Earth with semi-giant leadership, she had eventually to disclose to humans through direct experience lessons that
HUMAN MUSCLE IS NAUGHT as compared to the competence of The Mind-Directed Brain.
We humans are here in Universe to exercise the UNIVERSE-FUNCTIONING OF MIND.
Only MIND can APPREHEND, abide by, and be led by TRUTH. R.B.F.
THOUGHT: Activities of the brain function of a human. Humans are perpetual information gathers and the brain replays information/experience as a thought for the mind to relate to any given circumstance.
THINKING: Is a mind function that allows any human to have a choice in the way the thoughts are applied. Capable of using the mind to reason, reflect, refract, then to have cosmic choices and move towards different outcomes creating different futures
BRAIN/MIND=1 FUNCTIONS:
Store: to hold something away for use in the future. (BRAIN function)
Retrieve: to recall something that was put away in the past. (BRAIN function)
Aggregate: a total or whole made up of different parts from different source gathering: EYES, EARS, NOSE, MOUTH, SKIN. (MIND function)
Re-aggregate: to take two or more whole bits of separateness and bring them together into a new 1 whole.
(MIND function) JDS
Thinking is the consideration of different experiences and of inherently separate sets of events, and trying to find out what their relatedness is.
Each event = one star
How many stars does it take to develop geometry of out-ward-ness and in-ward-ness?
What is the minimum number of stars needed to divide the Universe into out-ward-ness and in-ward-ness?
I find it takes a minimum of four; you can't do it with three. Four very clearly has an out-side-ness and an in-side-ness. This is what we call the tetrahedron, which has these four stars and six sets of interrelatedness. This comes in very interestingly in mathematics with the generalization that you don't have to worry too much about the shape, but the four stars are the minimum we can have for a thought. If I can at first discover only three stars in a thought challenge, there must be at least a fourth star lurking somewhere in the critical neighborhood. In fact, I discover that the total number of stars that could possibly be related is always sub-divisible by four.
Tetrahedron becomes the minimum thinkable set, the minimum re-considerable set, and it turns out to be the fundamental increment out of which all thoughts are constructed.
Minds think exploratorially, sort and compose one thought, which is one metaphysically conceptual system, which at a minimum is one tetrahedron, can interrelate any four event points or subsystems, in non-simultaneous Universe.
Because of inherent non-simultaneity all thinking is tetra-tuning.
The (system- thoughts) can and always does include four identities:
1. The thinking individual (me) 
2. The present otherness (present)
3. The past otherness (past)
4. The future otherness (future)… ………..R. Buckminster Fuller – “Tetrascroll”
Omni-Symbol of Managed Space
JDS thought
EVERYTHING I NEED TO KNOW IS ALREADY THERE
ENTREPRENEURS CREATE EVERYTHING FROM NOTHING……….
BECAUSE IT IS ALREADY THERE
What is already there?
As strange as it seems, nothingness becomes everything and is often forgotten by the absolute Omni-everything. To ME, Omni-Everything = MY CIRCUMSTANCE
Not Your Circumstance…. My Circumstance
Each HU-Being is a Unique-Energy Inside its own “CIRCUMSTANCE”
Each Circumstance is an Illusion by Reflecting Sameness
Each HU-Being is a Refraction of Energy by its Uniqueness of Spirit
We are all the same yet different by G.O.Design of Spirit
In other words, a Reflection that changes by Refraction of Spirit
HU-Beings Decision Making in the 21 st Century:
Is a puzzle of Vital Feedback loops of Reflecting Circumstances and
Refraction of the HU-Being’s Feelings-Thoughts-Decisions-Energy
Unity is Plural @ Minimum of 2
Reflection/Refraction=1
No 2 Actions can be identical
An Action Evolves into a new Reflection Over TIME
4 Star Thinking
For the last 20 years, I have thinking through the concept of “-4 Star Thinking+”. It has been a dance of my insanity, a pursuit that has not been short of ridicule. I think insanity is a requirement of process and ridicule is part of a lesson of completeness. If somebody is not making it hard for “ME”, it is not worth doing. Easy is for everybody. And yet not for “ME”…. Ridicule of an idea……… just adds to the Insanity.
The Paradox of Life
4 star thinking starting Points:
4 star thinking always has 3 combining stars of thoughts and has 1Driving Star of thought
4 Stars of Tuning Thoughts and Decisions: IN, BETWEEN, AROUND = 3 combining Stars
OUT = the Driving Star
EVERYTHING I NEED TO KNOW IS ALREADY THERE……. ENTREPRENEURS CREATE EVERYTHING FROM NOTHING……….BECAUSE IT IS ALREADY THERE
What is already there?
“-TUNING IN 2 or TUNING OUT OF+” ARE FUNCTIONS OF G.O.DESIGN
The paradox of Unique is the Sameness.
The puzzle of Life for “ME” is knowing that Design Is Generic and MY life is Specific to “ME”
CREATING UNIQUE TO “ME” FUTURES
“IN” Creating Futures, the Space is already there.
Process is always OUT and Systems are always Inside a Space. Ergo Process OUT= 4 Star…..The driving star
Process (Action) is the Start of Physical Change
Complexities of Design are not complicated. They are made so by the Stupidity of K.I.S.S.
Universe is always Complex-Simple-Complex by G.O.Design
Out+ Energy is always the Driver of Change and always includes
“-Brain/Mind+”=1 “No Brain never Mind” From Koch
Physical/Metaphysical=1
Negative/Positive=1
All systems of Thought have 4 stars: 3 combining Stars and 1 Driving Star
“-IN BETWEEN AROUND Always there
Driver: Opportunity to change OUT+”
Judy Struggledork: I have been lucky to be involved in John’s quest for understanding for about 25 years. I remember we used to have a physical Bucky study group at John’s house all those years ago. Now, John still has a weekly Bucky study group… it’s just done via skype with people from all over the planet. Do I understand what John says and writes? Most of the time, no. Some of the time, yes. Do I think like John and understand principles as Bucky described them? Usually not. But I do know that John understands much of all this and I respect him for it and what he does with it. It is John’s 61st birthday (Happy Birthday!!) today and it is important to him and me that we write this week’s lesson… for whoever will get benefit from it (including me and us!).
What I know about me is that it is better for me to experience things in order to understand them. Once I have a special case around something, I understand it quite well from a cellular, organic experience point of view. And then I can use my understanding for future events. Just reading Bucky is overwhelming for me. So even though I resist change and risk, I accept that to have more special cases will broaden my world. So…..What can I do right now to gain more special cases? What can I do right now to make things a bit better?
John spoke about Ridicule. To me, ridicule means to put down or have a go at, criticise, discount. I think that all people ridicule other people and situations…. and I think that all people and situations get ridiculed. It’s just human nature. Honestly, I do see/hear a lot of people ridiculing John for what he thinks/writes/does. I know that John knows what he is doing in business and entrepreneurship. He has tons of experience and special cases behind him (much of it successful, some of it not). I just wish that people would get on and either do what John suggests or do what they want to do… just do something so that they can then get the feedback and correct. That is process… do something, get feedback, correct; then do something else, get feedback , correct. Again and again and again. With the aim of always getting a bit better each time and doing EMEL.
Back to ridicule…. John says he finds benefit in it and I see that. That John uses the feedback of ridicule to improve and change. I just get sick of it. I find it energy-sapping, hurtful, upsetting and futile. Maybe either I will get to the point where I don’t let the ridicule hurt me or we only do business stuff with people who think like we do. Either one would be a good outcome.
Judy….. out.
Until next week when we starts to builds stars of Business thinking
JDS OUT
