BOOK 2, LESSON 15 “SYSTEM-PROCESS”= 1 THOUGHTs of IMPROVEMENTS
SYSTEM: a combination of related parts organized into a complex whole, a scheme of ideas or principles by which something is organized, a method or set of procedures for achieving something, the use or result of careful planning and organization. Examples: METRIC-SYSTEM, ACCOUNTING- SYSTEM, or MONEY-SYSTEM
PROCESS: a series of actions directed towards a specific aim, a series of natural occurrences that produce change or development, FOLLOWING somebody or something according to an established procedure. Examples: MEASURING-DISTANCE, RECORDING-TRANSACTION, or DEPOSIT-MONEY
DUALITY: something consisting of 2, a situation or nature that has two states or parts that are complementary or opposed to each other, the theory that both wave and particle theory account for the behaviour of matter and energy under different conditions. Examples: “GRAIN OF SAND”(micro) “BEACH OF SAND”(macro)=1, “MACRO-MICRO”=1, or “BUSINESS-MARKETPLACE”=1
SYSTEM-PROCESS=1: ideas or principles organized in a system of “HUMAN-THOUGHTS”=1 + a series of action taken by an “ACTION-HUMAN”=1. Examples: “HUMAN-MEASURING” =1 height of body using metric system, “HUMAN-RECORDING”=1 sales transaction, or “HUMAN-DEPOSITING” =1 in placing money in a bank
INWARD: situated within something, relating to or existing in the mind or spirit, moving towards the inside or centre of something. Example: “ HUMAN-DEPOSITING” =1 in placing money in a bank
OUTWARD: word indicating that something is outside or towards the exterior of something, or relates to OUT of “ME”, relating to the physical body rather than the mind or spirit, heading away from a place. Example: “HUMAN-MEASURING” =1 height of body using “METRIC- SYSTEM”=1
“INWARD-OUTWARD”=1 “IN-OUT”=1
Bonus words:
IMPROVEMENT: the process of making something better or of becoming better, a change that can (“ADD-VALUE”=1) cause appreciation in perceived or real value of thoughts, real estate, or any aggregated “SYSTEM-PROCESS”=1
CORRECTION: an alteration that removes an error, removal of errors, an adjustment to calibrations; HUMAN-SYSTEM system of thought; “OBSERVE-MAINTAIN”=1 or “OBSERVE-CORRECT”=1
“HUMAN-CHOICE”=1 or “HUMAN-NO CHOICE”=1. CORRECTION is a human thought that “BECOMES- AWARE”=1 and makes alteration heading towards an evolved complexity. Not good or bad, right or wrong. “SIMPLE-COMPLEX”=1
“SYSTEMS-PROCESSES”=1
Since 1989, I have been on a journey of “PERSONAL-DEVELOPMENT”=1, It sounds strange that a 60 year old HUMAN in his mid-30’s started to consider personal development. Omni HUMANS are always in personal development. It took “ME” 30 odd years to understand “PERSONAL-DEVELOPMENT”=1 and its IMPORTANCE now “PERSON-DEVELOPMENT”=1 “IN” my AWARENESS! “IN-AWARENESS”=1; “NO-AWARENESS”=1. I’m part of a greater design of G.O.D. becoming AWARE of my ENVIRONMENT.
Now is a moment in which I become PRESENT. I start to understand “ME-ENVIRONMENT”=1. To really understand “SYSTEMS-PROCESSES”=1,I had to develop the idea of “SYSTEM-PROCESS”=1. Enter my “THOUGHT-MENTOR”=1, R. Buckminster Fuller and his thoughts on
“SYSTEM-PROCESS”=1.
Thinking is the consideration of different experiences and of inherently separate sets of events, and trying to find out what their relatedness is.
Each one is a star.
How many stars does it take to develop geometry of out-ward-ness and in-ward-ness?
What is the minimum number of stars needed to divide the Universe into out-ward-ness and in-ward-ness?
I find it takes a minimum of four; you can't do it with three. Four very clearly has an out-side-ness and an in-side-ness. This is what we call the tetrahedron, which has these four stars and six sets of interrelatedness. This comes in very interestingly in mathematics with the generalization that you don't have to worry too much about the shape, but the four stars are the minimum we can have for a thought. If I can at first discover only three stars in a thought challenge, there must be at least a fourth star lurking somewhere in the critical neighborhood. In fact, I discover that the total number of stars that could possibly be related is always sub-divisible by four.
Tetrahedron becomes the minimum thinkable set, the minimum re-considerable set, and it turns out to be the fundamental increment out of which all thoughts are constructed.
Minds think exploratorially, sort and compose one thought, which is one metaphysically conceptual system, which at a minimum is one tetrahedron, can interrelate any four event points or subsystems, in non-simultaneous Universe.
Because of inherent non-simultaneity all thinking is tetra-tuning.
The (system- thoughts) can and always does include four identities:
1. The thinking individual (me)
2. The present otherness (present)
3. The past otherness (past)
4. The future otherness (future)
R. Buckminster Fuller – “Tetrascroll”
Since 1989, I have been on my journey of BUSINESS and what it really means to “ME”. My biggest realization on my journey of “PERSONAL-DEVELOPMENT”=1 is that “EVERYTHING STARTS @ “ME” and must go to YOU creating. “WE” INWARD must move to OTHERS and OUR ENVIRONMENT OUTWARD.
TODAY AND EVERY DAY, I ASK MYSELF:
· How “AWARE-PRESENT”=1 am I?
· Who or what is the “ME-YOU”=1?
· What is the prevailing “CIRCUMSTANCE-ENVIRONMENT”=1?
· When will this become relevant? Ie: What is the “TIME-TIMING”=1?
4 STARS = HOW, WHO, WHAT, and WHEN
COMPLEXITY is when it goes to 6
“IN-OUT”=1
“BETWEEN-AROUND”=1
(4 STARS) + (“IN-OUT”=1+“BETWEEN=AROUND”=1) =6 LEVELS of THOUGHTS
“SIMPLY-COMPLEX”=1
“SYSTEM-PROCESS”=1
FORMULA
EVERYTHING STARTS @1 AND “DIVIDES-MULITPLING”=1
CREATING COMPLEXITIES
From Bucky Fuller:
WORDS are the first industrial tools, for inherently they involve a plurality of people and are also inherently prior to relayed communication and integration of the respective experiences of a plurality of individuals. This is reminiscent of the scriptural account, “In the beginning of Industrialization, through the relayed experience of all people – permitted through the individualization of the spoken and written word-
“Involves all experiences of all people everywhere in history” Bucky Fuller
SYNERGY means behavior of integral, aggregate, whole systems Un-predicted by behaviors of any of their components or sub-assemblies of their components taken separately from the whole. R. Buckminster Fuller
“SYSTEM-PROCESS”=1 is the study of “SYNERGETICS”
Exploring the “GEOMETRY-THOUGHT”=1
“DUALITY-UNIVERSE”=1 JDS STUDENT of “UNIVERSE-HUMANS”=1
JDS OUT
