Simple Complex Simple EMEL
Design becomes a System
Systems Idea: Space-Boundaries/Defined-Energy/Deployed-Time/Measured-Exchange/Accounted
System Idea-Agreements-Exchange-Transformation
Processes support the Design of a System by Feedback Signals
Experiment: Experience-Feedback-Measurements-Calibrations-Repeat
System-Action-Reaction-Resultant
Life is a continuum of Feedback Signals that if Tuned into and can Create Predictive Futures of Choice.
I have for years designed Systems from being a part of the Process.
· I create boundaries of Space that limits the system to a specific area and then find the Proximal Space.
Note: Proximal is the centre of the system.
· I then calibrate the Process by Time Measurements. Experiencing cycles of any given Process.
· Every Space has IN and OUT Boundaries
· Every Space has Between-ness and Around-ness, by Design of Principles of Universe
Life is always Between and Around
· System Designers decide what is IN or OUT and have the ability to create
Designed Predictive Created Futures
· Processes are Energy Movements that
· Always leave particles as feedback loops and
· Repeat as cycles re-occurring over TIME (loops) that
· Are measured (Aggregated) and then
· Calibrated (Re-Aggregated)
· All “-Systems/Processes=1+” have COSTs 
· That are measured over TIME 
· That have Energy Movements of Activites 
· That are always Exchanging Between and Around Space-Energy-Matter-Time-Money 
· Connecting the DOTS is how “-Systems/Processes=1+”
Create the EMEL
(Money is a HU-Being Invention and is part of the HU-Being Exchange World)
· Systems start Simple because of what is already there
· Systems become Complex by the number of New Relationships that are included IN the Systems design.
· Systems must become Invisible and New Habit Patterns of the Design create the New Simple. The New Simple is an EMEL.
“-Simple-Complex-Simple+”
8 years ago, I woke-up on an airplane and created a rough drawing of a Business System and what I thought were the words of the system. See above drawing as the latest evolved thought.
I shared the idea with a partner at the Time and was told I was far too complicated, “But don’t worry…. I will explain it so HU-Beings will understand you”.
I have to say that I was more than upset by the idea that a Design Thought could be explained.
I draw a concept to hold a Space whilst I test the thought by Processing (taking Actions) and
“-Observing Feedback Loops+”
“-DrawingThought-Action-Reaction-Resultant-Measurement-Calibration+”
Repeat
“-Action-Reaction-Resultant-Measurement-Calibration+”
Reflect Aggregate/Refract Re-Aggregate
Change Happens in the Vital Now-Evolution happens over Intergenerational Cycles
That takes Time and Process that always has Feedback Loops (no exception)
Design in my opinion can’t be explained…….
Process and Experience creates Evolution to more Complex understanding of Systems IN Universe.
Talk is Cheap
“-Simple-Complex-Simple+”
LET THERE BE LIGHT
I don’t know how to explain this Process without Hind Sight and the
Process of Experiences over Time and Process-Cycles
· During all those years of experimentation and research, I never once made a discovery. All my work was deductive, and the results I achieved were those of invention, pure and simple. I would construct a theory and work on its lines until I found it was untenable. Then it would be discarded at once and another theory evolved. This was the only possible way for me to work out the problem. … I speak without exaggeration when I say that I have constructed 3,000 different theories in connection with the electric light, each one of them reasonable and apparently likely to be true. Yet only in two cases did my experiments prove the truth of my theory. My chief difficulty was in constructing the carbon filament. . . . Every quarter of the globe was ransacked by my agents, and all sorts of the queerest materials used, until finally the shred of bamboo, now utilized by us, and was settled upon. On Edison’s years of research in developing the electric light bulb, as quoted in "Talks with Edison" by George Parsons Arthropod in Harper magazine, Vol. 80 (February 1890), p. 425.
“-Systems/Processes=1+” require both Meta-physical and Physical disciplines over many timed cycles to evolve into the Invisible New-Simple EMEL.
“-Complexities+” always Test the resolve of the“-Systems/Processes=1+”
Creators of the New Simple Futures
JDS OUT 
Comments